ESA Home ESA About ESA Membership ESA Publications ESA Annual Meeting ESA Employment
ESA Certification ESA Resources ESA Awards Students Networks
Search ESA Site:
Search Help
ESA Site Map
Overview
What's Available
ESA Honors
ESA Professional Awards
ESA Student Awards & Scholarships
ESA Grants
Foundation Professional Awards
Foundation Student Awards & Scholarships
Foundation Grants
Schedule for Current Year
Procedures
General Procedures
Electronic Submission Requirements & Submission Options
CV Template
Judging Panels
Past Winners & Honorees
Award & Scholarship Sponsors

Information on the Poster Competition

The Evaluation and Judging

Students who present posters in the Student Competition for the President's Prize will be evaluated in two areas:

  1. Scientific Content (60%)
    1. Title and abstract (maximum of 250 words) from the poster presentation request form—Clarity of information, organization, and grammar (15 points)
    2. Poster content—Background and literature cited, study design or approach to problem, results, interpretation and significance to field. Quality of research will be judged on its scientific rigor and significance as conveyed by the poster. Be certain to address why the research was conducted and why the results are important. Poster displays must be self-explanatory. Although judges may discuss poster displays with students, such interaction is not included in the evaluation of the display. (45 points)
  2. Poster Display (40%)
    1. Organization—Logical order, smooth transitions, minimum redundancy, and effective use of space (20 points)
    2. Figures, Tables, Text Boxes—Legibility, grammar and spelling, and graphics coordinated with text (20 points)

Each poster display is judged independently by three judges who were selected by the Section Presidents. Judges are encouraged to provide constructive comments for each presentation; however, comments may be very brief or absent because of the limited time available to comment. A sample of the poster display evaluation form is included in this section.

In the event of a tie or a major discrepancy in scores, the judges will meet with the Student Competition Chair(s) to resolve the issue(s). Students who finish in second place will be identified for honorable mention.

The Sessions

Students compete only against the students in their poster display session. Students have been grouped into judging sessions that typically include no less than six, but no more than 12, posters, although up to 13 is allowed. The size of each poster session depends on the initial number of posters submitted to a specific Section. Some Sections are subdivided to accommodate the large number of submissions. Others are combined because of the low number of submissions or to maintain the maximum limit of 12 papers per session.

The Poster     

Poster design can significantly enhance or severely diminish the effectiveness of your presentation. The following guidelines are general considerations:

§         Focus of attention: The focus of attention must be on the subject content. If the design overshadows the subject matter, the message is likely to be lost.

§         Size and selection of visuals: Larger visuals attract more attention. Visuals not relevant to the content will distract the viewer.

§         Density of visuals and text (labels): Too many visuals (pictures) and text (labels) in a small space decreases readers’ attention, because each object is in competition with the others. Minimize these to prevent stimulus overload! Generally, a maximum length of 50-75 words per label results in a higher probability of people reading it.

§         Ability to read text: Letters should be large so that they can easily be read from 2-3 feet away. Letters should be easily read (avoid Old English and other "fancy" fonts).

§         Poster layout:

o        Use a consistent layout with heading and subheading font and size standardized;

o        Use bulleted lists to facilitate reading;

o        Relate the content of the text to the picture it describes;

o        Reduce competing stimuli—Avoid placing a large number of labels and visuals next to one another; and

o        Provide good contrast between the text and background (avoid white on white, blue on navy, etc.).

From Visitor Evaluation: A Workshop Manual by Stephen Bitgood, Center for Social Design, P.O. Box 1111, Jacksonville, AL 36265

 

 

Print the contents of this page Send the contents of this page to a Friend
print this article  |  e-mail this article

© 1995–2008 Entomological Society of America
10001 Derekwood Lane, Suite 100, Lanham, MD 20706-4876
tel. (301) 731-4535; fax (301) 731-4538; e-mail esa@entsoc.org
Click here for full disclaimer.

Members: If you know of changes that need to be made to this site,
please contact the Webmaster.